Proposed TRE Scenario
Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2025 11:27 am
Colleagues—
I appreciate the thoughtful, methodical effort and dialogue we’ve had around the budget so far. We’ve heard from the community about the pressing needs that the city faces during this budget process. We’ve also heard during this process the continued concern in our city about affordability.
This council has collectively prioritized putting affordability first and done excellent work related to affordability. I know we all are justifiably proud of our work. We know that our constituents find themselves in a tough financial predicament. To help them, I encourage us to continue to be thoughtful about affordability and concerned about any additional rate and tax burden we place on homeowners and renters.
We are diligent when it comes to affordability in housing and the creation of the Austin Infrastructure Academy to help people with family-sustaining careers. Last week, we diligently looked at (and delayed) rate increases for three utilities—Aqua, Texas Gas Service, and Oncor—because of the potential impact on affordability. We also spent lots of time looking at the impact DSD permitting costs have on affordability and costs like new meters for ADU development. We also built in affordability goals at AE.
We need to apply the same diligence to the impact that increased rates and taxes in the budget will have on people.
At the same time, we have very real service needs in Austin. The needs cost money. From addressing homelessness to maintaining our parkland, Austin is facing critical issues. And our finances have become more difficult for a variety of reasons.
While I see a TRE as needed in these uncertain financial times, I believe it’s important to strike a balance with the cost to Austinites, including those who rent, and its impact on affordability. Even if we believe we can win an election at a higher amount, we need to take care both to reduce the risk of losing an election and to provide the best possible balance with affordability. Even if we think a higher amount could win doesn’t make it the best policy.
As you know, the manager’s proposed base budget raises rates and taxes, impacting affordability. It also addresses some of our service priorities such as:
- $12.5 million for Street Outreach Coordinators within the Homeless Strategy Office and funding for the 8th Street Shelter and the Marshalling Yard shelter
- $4.0 million for the emergency rental assistance program
- Increased funding for our Parks and Rec Department to improve parks and cemetery maintenance, youth athletic fields and support for the Colony Park pool
- 4% cost-of-living adjustment for our city employees, with a living wage for hourly employees at $22.01
- Staff support for storm drain repairs and vegetation maintenance
- Establishes a Human Rights Division focused on outreach and engagement for Austin residents
- Austin Energy is adding $3.7 million to its Customer Energy Solutions rebates, incentives, and solar program
Beyond the proposed base budget, I’m sharing a proposed scenario for a $0.035 tax rate election that provides for basic city services and still places an emphasis on affordability. It doesn’t do all that I would like to see us be able to do in terms of funding services, and it also adds to the tax burden. But my hope is it offers voters a balanced way to preserve some important services while minimizing the damage on our affordability efforts.
http://assets.austintexas.gov/austincou ... 111219.pdf
Highlights from the proposed plan:
- Fully fund the Homeless Strategy Office plan (fully funding HSO has been a deep focus of every member of this council)
- $1.0 million for wildfire mitigation
- $3.0 million for the Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services
- $3.5 million for the expanded mobile crisis outreach team (EMCOT)
- $3.8 million for parkland maintenance
While I believe this proposal has the right emphasis and has important balance, the funding item that I most wish it included is the potential for a cost-of-living adjustment for our city employees in future years.
I urge us to affirm our commitment to making Austin affordable. It’s not easy in tough budget times. I believe this proposal, while not perfect, is balanced and one Austinites can support. I look forward to having these discussions as we continue to go through our budget process.
Thanks—
Kirk
On Behalf of Mayor Watson
I appreciate the thoughtful, methodical effort and dialogue we’ve had around the budget so far. We’ve heard from the community about the pressing needs that the city faces during this budget process. We’ve also heard during this process the continued concern in our city about affordability.
This council has collectively prioritized putting affordability first and done excellent work related to affordability. I know we all are justifiably proud of our work. We know that our constituents find themselves in a tough financial predicament. To help them, I encourage us to continue to be thoughtful about affordability and concerned about any additional rate and tax burden we place on homeowners and renters.
We are diligent when it comes to affordability in housing and the creation of the Austin Infrastructure Academy to help people with family-sustaining careers. Last week, we diligently looked at (and delayed) rate increases for three utilities—Aqua, Texas Gas Service, and Oncor—because of the potential impact on affordability. We also spent lots of time looking at the impact DSD permitting costs have on affordability and costs like new meters for ADU development. We also built in affordability goals at AE.
We need to apply the same diligence to the impact that increased rates and taxes in the budget will have on people.
At the same time, we have very real service needs in Austin. The needs cost money. From addressing homelessness to maintaining our parkland, Austin is facing critical issues. And our finances have become more difficult for a variety of reasons.
While I see a TRE as needed in these uncertain financial times, I believe it’s important to strike a balance with the cost to Austinites, including those who rent, and its impact on affordability. Even if we believe we can win an election at a higher amount, we need to take care both to reduce the risk of losing an election and to provide the best possible balance with affordability. Even if we think a higher amount could win doesn’t make it the best policy.
As you know, the manager’s proposed base budget raises rates and taxes, impacting affordability. It also addresses some of our service priorities such as:
- $12.5 million for Street Outreach Coordinators within the Homeless Strategy Office and funding for the 8th Street Shelter and the Marshalling Yard shelter
- $4.0 million for the emergency rental assistance program
- Increased funding for our Parks and Rec Department to improve parks and cemetery maintenance, youth athletic fields and support for the Colony Park pool
- 4% cost-of-living adjustment for our city employees, with a living wage for hourly employees at $22.01
- Staff support for storm drain repairs and vegetation maintenance
- Establishes a Human Rights Division focused on outreach and engagement for Austin residents
- Austin Energy is adding $3.7 million to its Customer Energy Solutions rebates, incentives, and solar program
Beyond the proposed base budget, I’m sharing a proposed scenario for a $0.035 tax rate election that provides for basic city services and still places an emphasis on affordability. It doesn’t do all that I would like to see us be able to do in terms of funding services, and it also adds to the tax burden. But my hope is it offers voters a balanced way to preserve some important services while minimizing the damage on our affordability efforts.
http://assets.austintexas.gov/austincou ... 111219.pdf
Highlights from the proposed plan:
- Fully fund the Homeless Strategy Office plan (fully funding HSO has been a deep focus of every member of this council)
- $1.0 million for wildfire mitigation
- $3.0 million for the Austin-Travis County Emergency Medical Services
- $3.5 million for the expanded mobile crisis outreach team (EMCOT)
- $3.8 million for parkland maintenance
While I believe this proposal has the right emphasis and has important balance, the funding item that I most wish it included is the potential for a cost-of-living adjustment for our city employees in future years.
I urge us to affirm our commitment to making Austin affordable. It’s not easy in tough budget times. I believe this proposal, while not perfect, is balanced and one Austinites can support. I look forward to having these discussions as we continue to go through our budget process.
Thanks—
Kirk
On Behalf of Mayor Watson